From a Marine....

First posted 9-11-04:

The proud warriors of Baker Company wanted to do something to pay tribute to our fallen comrades. So since we are part of the only Marine Infantry Battalion left in Iraq the one way that we could think of doing that is by taking a picture of Baker Company saying the way we feel. It would be awesome if you could find a way to share this with our fellow countrymen.

I was wondering if there was any way to get this into your papers to let the world know that "WE HAVE NOT FORGOTTEN" and are proud to serve our country." Semper Fi
1stSgt Dave Jobe

This post and photograph is being spread across blogs voluntarily. There is no need to request permission to do so. Simply download the photograph, upload it to wherever you can and share the 1stSgt.'s sentiment with the world.

The world still needs reminding. And our Troops need remembering. Thank them for our freedoms every chance you get.

Photographs

Some people/things I enjoy and some of my own photographs:

http://www.cpltrainer.com/gallery.html

This was my wedding cake - I just celebrated my second anniversary.



The layout on the gallery page is a bit rough for now but I'll get around to fixing it, I suspect.

Some Favorite Quotes....

I can't attribute a few of these but I admire the thinking, nonetheless...

"An open mind is one thing; letting geese run around in there is quite another."

NRA - What you want would all be impossible if it were not for us crazies. "...shall not be infringed," meant just that. If we protected the 2nd amendment as asiduously as we protect the first amendment, I'd have a howitzer at home instead of a small number of small arms. -- Doc

When you consider something like death, after which (there being no newsflash to the contrary) we may well go out like a candle flame, then it probably doesn't matter if we try too hard, are awkward sometimes, care for one another too deeply, are excessively curious about nature, are too opento experience, enjoy a nonstop expense of the senses in an effort to know life intimately and lovingly. -- Diane Ackerman

Every man should use his intellect, not as he uses his lamp in the study, only for his own seeing, but as the lighthouse uses its lamps, that those afar off on the seas may see the shining, and learn their way.-- H. W. Beecher

"Every government degenerates when trusted to the rulers of thepeople alone. The people themselves, therefore, are its onlysafe depositories." --Thomas Jefferson

"Here's a sillygism for them: They think gun owners are dangerous. But they also think it is safe for them to try taking away guns from millions of gun owners." -- J. Neil Schulman

Thomas Jefferson, of Virginia:

"No free man shall ever be debarred the use of arms." *Proposed Virginia Constitution, 1776 "Laws that forbid the carrying of arms. . disarm only those who are neither inclined nor determined to commit crimes. . Such laws make things worse for the assaulted and better for the assailants; they serve rather to encourage than to prevent homicides, for an unarmed man may be attacked with greater confidence than an armed man." -- Jefferson's "Commonplace Book," 1774-1776, quoting from On Crimes and Punishment, by criminologist Cesare Beccaria, 1764

"The Constitution of most of our states (and of the United States) asserts that all power is inherent in the people; that they may exercise it by themselves; that it is their right and duty to be at all times armed." -Thomas Jefferson

"Sometimes it is said that man cannot be trusted with the government of himself. Can he, then, be trusted with the government of others?" - Thomas Jefferson

"The spirit of resistance to government is so valuable on certain occasions that I wish it to be always kept alive." - Thomas Jefferson

George Mason, of Virginia:

"[W]hen the resolution of enslaving America was formed in Great Britain, the British Parliament was advised by an artful man, who was governor of Pennsylvania, to disarm the people; that it was the best and most effectual way to enslave them; but that they should not do it openly, but weaken them, and let them sink gradually.". . . I ask, who are the militia? They consist now of the whole people, except a few public officers." -- Virginia's U.S. Constitution ratification convention, 1788

"That the People have a right to keep and bear Arms; that a well regulated Militia, composed of the Body of the People, trained to arms, is the proper, natural, and safe Defence of a free state." Within Mason's declaration of "the essential and unalienable Rights of the People," -- later adopted by the Virginia ratification convention, 1788

Samuel Adams, of Massachusetts:

"The said Constitution [shall] be never construed to authorize Congress to infringe the just liberty of the press, or the rights of conscience; or to prevent the people of the United States, who are peaceable citizens, from keeping their own arms." -- Massachusetts' U.S. Constitution ratification convention, 1788

William Grayson, of Virginia:

"[A] string of amendments were presented to the lower House; these altogether respected personal liberty." -- Letter to Patrick Henry, June 12, 1789, referring to the introduction of what became the Bill of Rights

Richard Henry Lee, of Virginia:

"A militia when properly formed are in fact the people themselves . . . and include all men capable of bearing arms. . . To preserve liberty it is essential that the whole body of people always possess arms... The mind that aims at a select militia, must be influenced by a truly anti-republican principle." -- Additional Letters From The Federal Farmer, 1788

James Madison, of Virginia:

The Constitution preserves "the advantage of being armed which Americans possess over the people of almost every other nation. . . (where) the governments are afraid to trust the people with arms." -- The Federalist, No. 46

Tench Coxe, of Pennsylvania:

"The militia, who are in fact the effective part of the people at large, will render many troops quite unnecessary. They will form a powerful check upon the regular troops, and will generally be sufficient to over-awe them." -- An American Citizen, Oct. 21, 1787 "Who are the militia? Are they not ourselves? Congress have no power to disarm the militia. Their swords and every other terrible implement of the soldier, are the birthright of an American . . . . The unlimited power of the sword is not in the hands of either the federal or state governments, but, where I trust in God it will ever remain, in the hands of the people." -- The Pennsylvania Gazette, Feb. 20, 1788

"As the military forces which must occasionally be raised to defend our country, might pervert their power to the injury of their fellow citizens, the people are confirmed by the next article (of amendment) in their right to keep and bear their private arms." -- Federal Gazette, June 18, 1789

Noah Webster, of Pennsylvania:

"Before a standing army can rule, the people must be disarmed; as they are in almost every kingdom in Europe. The supreme power in America cannot enforce unjust laws by the sword; because the whole body of the people are armed, and constitute a force superior to any band of regular troops that can be, on any pretence, raised in the United States. A military force, at the command of Congress, can execute no laws, but such as the people perceive to be just and constitutional; for they will possess the power." -- An Examination of The Leading Principles of the Federal Constitution, Philadelphia, 1787

Alexander Hamilton, of New York:

"[I]f circumstances should at any time oblige the government to form an army of any magnitude, that army can never be formidable to the liberties of the people while there is a large body of citizens, little if at all inferior to them in discipline and the use of arms, who stand ready to defend their rights and those of their fellow citizens." -- The Federalist, No. 29

Thomas Paine, of Pennsylvania:

"[A]rms discourage and keep the invader and plunderer in awe, and preserve order in the world as well as property. . Horrid mischief would ensue were the law-abiding deprived of the use of them." -- Thoughts On Defensive War, 1775

" . . . balance would be preserved were all the world destitute of arms, for all would be alike; but since some will not, others dare not lay them aside. . . Horrid mischief would ensue were one half the world deprived of the use of them . . . " - Thomas Paine
Fisher Ames, of Massachusetts:

"The rights of conscience, of bearing arms, of changing the government, are declared to be inherent in the people." -- Letter to F.R. Minoe, June 12, 1789 Elbridge Gerry, of Massachusetts: "What, sir, is the use of militia? It is to prevent the establishment of a standing army, the bane of liberty. . . Whenever Government means to invade the rights and liberties of the people, they always attempt to destroy the militia, in order to raise a standing army upon its ruins." -- Debate, U.S. House of Representatives, August 17, 1789

Patrick Henry, of Virginia:

"Guard with jealous attention the public liberty. Suspect everyone who approaches that jewel." -- Virginia's U.S. Constitution ratification convention

"The very atmosphere of firearms anywhere and everywhere restrains evil interference - they deserve a place of honor with all that's good" - George Washington

Samuel Adams:

"If ye love wealth greater than liberty, the tranquility of servitude greater than the animating contest for freedom, go home from us in peace. We seek not your counsel nor your arms. Crouch down and lick the hand that feeds you; and may posterity forget that ye were once our countrymen." - Samuel Adams

Happy New Year

Hope it's the best and brightest and our freedoms continue to grow.

A Conundrum

The UN's loudmouth, Jan Egeland calls us stingy at the same time that India is telling us No thanks, we don't need your help. Now, to be honest, I don't want to give six cents to any UN initiative and think we can adequately find ways to assist in the region without pouring more dollars into a corrupt, and largely useless (other than to disarm, rape, murder and otherwise create havoc in the world) organization but I have to admit to being surprised to read that India's Prime Minister had this to say about the United States:

``If and when we need their help, we will inform them,'' Manmohan Singh said. ``Several countries have offered assistance to us. The president of the United States spoke to me; several other countries' statesmen have also spoken to me.

Well, ok, you daft bastard, bury your dead and feed your hungry on your own. Here's hoping the New Year finds the survivors ready to elect someone just a wee bit more on the sane side.

Asshat.

Half-Dead, Fully-Crazed PITA

I decided to check out my "pirate name" - never mind the reason why I'd fill my time on New Year's Eve with that bit of silliness. It came back thusly:

Captain Bess Read
Even though there's no legal rank on a pirate ship, everyone recognizes you're the one in charge. Even through many pirates have a reputation for not being the brightest souls on earth, you defy the sterotypes. You've got taste and education. Arr!

Through? Though, maybe? Sterotype? Is that different than stereotype?

I was surprised the name didn't come up Half-Dead Fully-crazed PITA... a lot of people would more than agree with the assessment.

It is almost impossible to conceive...

Of whole towns, areas, islands, even, gone. These are sets of true color set of photographs, taken six months, five days apart.

Below is Banda Aceh, the provincial capitol on northern Sumatra in Indonesia, before and after. There are more than 3,000 dead at the time of this post.

Images courtesy DigitalGlobe




Sri Lanka Beach - the "pull back" of the wave. Some 28,000 dead in that country at the time of this post. 343 meters is approximately 1125 feet.





I teach geology at a local community college and I continue to view this tragedy from so many different perspectives.

Part of me looks at it coolly. This happened thus and triggered this, which triggered that and from there we came to more than 120,000 people dead.

Another part of me stands bathed in awe and horror at the power and devastation that can explode in moments, in seconds, without any of us having the ability to predict where and when everything could end for us.

Oklahoma Legislators Get It Right

In Oklahoma, HB2122 passed and was signed by the Governor.

This new law allows Permit/License holders to carry onto private parking lots their concealed firearm and store it in their locked vehicle. The Bill States, "No person, property owner, tenant, employer, or business entity shall be permitted to establish any policy or rule that has the effect of prohibiting any person, except a convicted felon, from transporting and storing firearms in a locked vehicle on any property set aside for any vehicle."

The law was enacted to prohibit the creation of a rule or policy that would not allow a person, except a convicted felon, from transporting and storing firearms in a locked vehicle on any property set aside for any vehicle. It makes complete sense and the law is both concise and well-written.

Full November 27th Story from NW Arkansasa News
Excerpts (emphasis mine):

VALLIANT, Okla. — In late summer of 2002, Steve Bastible put three bullets into a dying cow at his ranch, threw the emptied rifle behind the seat of his pickup and forgot about it.

A few weeks later, the rifle cost him his job of 23 years.

That Oct. 1, in a surprise search, Weyerhaeuser Co. sent gun-sniffing dogs into the parking lot of its Valliant paper mill. Bastible and 11 other workers were fired after guns were found in their vehicles. The timber company said the weapons violated a new company policy that extended a longtime workplace gun ban to the parking area. The fired workers said they knew nothing of the new rule.

Meanwhile, several of the paper-mill workers have filed wrongful discharge lawsuits against Weyerhaeuser and its subcontractors, which employed the workers. "This is a heck of an injustice that needs to be fixed," said their Tulsa lawyer, Larry Johnson.

The debate transcends partisan politics. Nearly 90 percent of voters in the county are registered Democrats, and yet 66 percent of county voters cast ballots for George Bush for president, in part because they viewed him as more pro-gun.

Ellis, a former mill worker, counters: "These are good, hardworking, tax-paying, law-abiding citizens. I just wish these big companies could understand that these people are not a threat to anybody."

Hearing of the case, the National Rifle Association referred the workers to Johnson, a longtime gun-rights advocate. Johnson contacted Ellis, and together they crafted what was to become the new law.

The law remains on hold as the legal dispute unfolds in court.

They sent gun-sniffing dogs in against their own employees. What complete jackasses.

Three points here....

(1) I'll do my best to never spend another dime on anything mfd. by Whirlpool or Weyerhaeuser (and I know Weyerhaeuser won't be easy) and I don't personally care that Whirlpool backed out.

(2) Despite the reasonable comments from pro-gun advocates that I have read recently, it simply doesn't change the facts. Employers don't own the cars. They need to understand staying the hell out of their employees personal lives. They have no business telling employees what they can or cannot have in their car as long as it's legal. If it's not legal and they have a reason to suspect its presence on company property then they can go ahead and report it to the police but making some intrusive workplace rule that extends far beyond what is really any of their business is simply not acceptable.

(3) This relates to #2 above. I've watched this issue for a short period of time and am just nauseated by the people who seem to have supported firearms rights in the past but now can't see beyond their own little declared fiefdoms to reognize that firearms rights do go beyond their limited speres of control - and damned well ought to.

Nobody has the right to tell me what I can or can't have in my car as long as it is legal. Nobody. Not my employer, not my spouse, not my kid, not anyone. Under the workplace rules even some so-called pro-gun business owners put forth, issuing me a paycheck allows:

Catholic employers can tell us no condoms in our purses.
Moslem employers can tell us no SlimJims hidden in our purses for a snack.
Christian employers can tell us no mezuzah or six-sided stars.
No bumper stickers supporting the opposing party during election cycles.
No anti/pro-gun bumper stickers.
No crosses worn as jewelry.
What else?
No employee may use birth control?
No employee may think impure thoughts?

Employers do not, by law, always have a choice what employees they hire, and I am not talking just about discriminatory practices (i.e. race, sex, etc.) in hiring. There are instances where an employer must meet certain other requirements.

Michigan State Law has some Criminal Enterprize Zones built into the Concealed Carry Law. However, they have also modified the law to make clear that parking lots are not part of the forbidden zone and firearms may be carried there. Any employer who cannot recognize that his or her employees are entitled to carry what they darned well please (within the confines of statute) in their motor vehicle are simply not thinking. Any employer who believes that he or she has the right to dictate to an employee on issues such as this has taken their God Complex to a new high. And anyone claiming to be Pro-Second Amendment that doesn't get "shall not be infringed" needs to go back and do some reading on the subject, starting with the Constitution and its authors' followup discussions and statements and moving right on to the recent Department of Justice's paper that declares "The Second Amendment secures a right of individuals generally, not a right of States or a right restricted to persons serving in militias."

Frankly, I don't buy the idea that an employer has absolute power over employees. This isn't just a private property issue. One doesn't lose one's rights to an employer just because that employer give one a job. In some cases, even as the God-Like power some of the selectively pro-gun business owners I know appear to be claiming the employer has the right to be, that kind of behavior could get your butts slapped in jail.I count some of these folks my friends but cannot grasp how they can believe that their rights override Constitutional Law. The claim is that it's their property and our State is an "At Will" employment state so they can make any rule they choose.

Rule #1 - Employee must not carry any firearms onto company property, even safely locked inside the employee's motor vehicle.
Rule #2 - Employee must endeavor to circumvent federal import-export laws as periodically required by the employer.
Rule #3 - Employees deemed to have full, ripe lips shall, as periodically required by employer, kneel and perform fellatio.

You can see how stupid this claim to total employer autonomy is.

I hope we do see this OK law resolved soon, and I also hope we can see it (or something like it) here in Michigan.

I also hope more pro-gun advocates will be able to one day see firearms rights as the Constitutional issue it is, rather than isolating this or that part of firearms rights according to their particular acceptance level.

"A well-regulated Militia being necessary to the security of a free State, the right of the people to keep and bear Arms shall not be infringed."

'Nuff said.

It's no laughing matter, Officer Fox...

Today I went over to Shelby Twp, in Macomb County, MI and had a very scary experience. Because one of the places I was going today was a college campus and I would be in a classroom, I did not have my carry pistol with me.

On the way home, I stopped at CostCo to try to find some dog food. I drove around looking for a spot to park and suddenly, someone was backing out of a spot, so I flipped on my blinker to pull into a spot on my right.

A man suddenly came charging from across the aisle to my left and ran around and sort of half climbed onto the front right side of my vehicle. He was screaming something but, up to that point, I had my radio going and the windows rolled up (it's mid-December, after all) and I couldn't hear what he was screaming. My first thoughts were a jumble of get off, look back, anyone behind me, blocked in, go forward would mean hitting him, sh*t!

I gestured as though waving him off and screamed, "Get off!" a couple of times but he only became more irate. I couldn't figure it out. He was in a parking space, in a parked car when he first jumped out and came after me so what the heck was going on?!?

I still couldn't hear what he was saying, still couldn't move without running him over and sure as heck wasn't going to roll a window down or open a door and politely ask what he wanted. He simply would not move, wouldn't let me move.

I reached down, without taking my eyes off him, and got my cell phone and dialed 911. I got a dispatcher on the line and started explaining the situation and she transferred me over to another department (geographically) and I began again.

Still, the guy is all over my car, won't let me move and frankly, is worrying me a whole bunch since he's obviously not stable, a good 6'2" tall and weighing in around 220 and also is more like 30 years old to my 50. And I'm unarmed, damn it, because college classrooms are Criminal Empowerment Zones in the State of Michigan. As a certified teacher with several degrees, I cannot understand anyone's fear of me carrying my firearm, especially since I am licensed, trained, and have undergone the necessary background checks, etc., but I'll leave that for another day to discuss.

The dispatcher takes a description, tells me she'll send an officer and there I am, still stuck and no way to move. I was blocked by traffic behind and to go forward would have meant running him over. Not that I wouldn't have eventually, to be honest, but it just wasn't to the "deadly force" point yet, in my judgment.

The next thing this crazy man does is signal to someone behind me to come around and this really lit a fire under me. I screamed for him to get off my car, which he still would not do, and there on the side of me was a big green SUV, which he now directed into the spot in front of me.

This lunatic had risked his life and mine to give someone a parking spot.

It wasn't his vehicle, he was never in it, he came from another parked vehicle and, I eventually found out, he had two children and his wife in his own SUV across the way while he was doing all of this. Amazingly stupid. One might even say deranged.

While he was waving this other vehicle in, I again looked back to see if I could back away from him and escape, but I was still blocked in by other vehicles. With the SUV he had signaled to blocking me in from the front, he ran to his own vehicle. Frankly, now I'm thinking he's going for a gun, but what he actually does, to my complete amazement, is grab a small boy, about 2 years old, out of the back seat, and come running back to my vehicle, screaming, with one hand reaching for my door.

All the other doors were locked but mine was not so I just flipped my arm up and slammed the lock down with the back of my arm.

I wanted out of there badly, but I was still blocked by other vehicles and now to get past this guy, I'd have had to hit him and this small boy in his arms.

His wife (or the woman he was with, whomever she was) got out of their vehicle and hollered something to him, and at that point, he simply turned around and walked casually away and into CostCo.

My God.

I parked my car about two rows down and went to where the police dispatcher had told me to wait. I was still on red alert, believe me, but I didn't want to just walk away and let this lunatic go free to attack someone else less prepared or more vulnerable.

Since my digital camera is always in tow, and police can be slow to respond, I decided to sneak and get a couple of quick shots of his license plate and vehicle, which I did.



If you live in the area or in SE Michigan, this is a vehicle you want to keep half an eye out for. It's a black, newer model Dodge Durango, as you can see, with the license plate as shown, etc. A dark haired male, about 6 feet tall or so, black hair, olive complexion, winter coat is blue and black, but predominately royal blue, and he is volatile.

Think about it. He risked being run over and then brought a small child into the situation, for someone else to get a parking spot.

That's not sane.

Eventually, an officer showed up. It was approximately 15 minutes after the incident ended and it was a very nerve-wracking fifteen minutes. I was, after all, asked to stand in an open area, accessible to the same lunatic that went on the attack in the first place, and wait, without any means of self-defense, for an officer to arrive.

When he did arrive, he took my statement then asked me to follow him into the store to attempt to identify the man. I did so. The man had taken off his coat and stuffed it into his cart and put some things on top of it, but I still knew him to be the man who had acted so irrationally.

In perhaps five minutes the officer returned to me and two other officers joined him. They proceeded to tell me that there was no problem, that the guy was just trying to get someone a parking spot and that I was overreacting. They laughed at me being fearful for my safety and took me to the front of the store and explained that I was overreacting and he just felt he deserved the parking space. "It's crowded, people want to park, he felt he should be able to park there."

No, I countered, he was already parked. This crazy man did this, trapped me so I couldn't go anywhere, climbed all over my car, eventually charged the side of my vehicle with a small child in his arms and terrified me for someone else to get a spot?!?!?!?

And you Officers of the Law don't see a problem with that?

I asked for a report number, wrote down the officer's name and badge number and the officer, whose competence I definitely doubt by now, asks me if I am going to go shopping here.

Eh? What? Shopping here?

No, I am not.

He offers to walk me out to my car. I say yes, like it or not. I now have zero respect for him, but I am forced, by circumstances beyond my control, to rely on him to get me safely to my vehicle.

We walk to the front of the building, exit, and I head to my car, with him behind me.

I think.

After a few more steps, I turn to ask him where I can get a copy of the police report and when, and he is gone.

He has left me alone, unprotected, with this man a few hundred feet away who was already irrational, who now knows I have called the police on him.

What can he have been thinking? As I went past the second SUV, the one the man risked his life to get a parking spot for, I quickly memorized the license plate. It's easy because it's a personalized plate - BUDZKY - on a green Dodge Durango. I hustle back to my car, jump in and drive away.

As I drive, heading in the general direction of home, it all finally hits me. I'm not one to panic or cry or any of that while something is happening, but now, after a few moments, I am weeping, my heart is pounding, I keep thinking how easily someone could have been hurt or even killed and I call the Shelby Township Police Department and ask to speak to someone because I want to file a citizen's complaint against this officer.

After some soothing chat from the Lieutenant in charge, who still doesn't seem to get the point any more than his officer did, that I was threatened and detained against my will by this man, he tells me he'll talk to his officer and get back to me. I was ok with that because I believe in the system, basically, although it appears I was much too hopeful and far too naive.

I made it home safely and took pictures of my vehicle with the side all cleaned off where he'd been climbing on it and the dust, etc. had been rubbed clean and the fingerprints all over the top of the vehicle where he had been "holding" onto it to keep me from moving or going anywhere. The officer, by the way, had declined to look at my vehicle at all. He was too entertained, I guess, by the idea of me being intimidated by this big, irrational local boy.




As you can see, the side is wiped clean by his being all over it and the fingerprints clearly show he was on the vehicle. Would the officer been happier, I wonder, if I had chosen to drive over this man's feet to get away, or if I had panicked and stomped on the gas, throwing him off the vehicle and possible running him over and injuring or killing him? Certainly, this had the potential to go in that direction but the officer seem fine with that and even amused by the whole incident.

His Lieutenant called me back and proceeded to justify everything the officer did, and then basically called me a liar.I asked him to mail me a citizen complaint form which he refused to do, telling me I had to come into the station there to file a complaint. He told me I could come in, write a statement and that he would take care of it.

I asked him where I could get the complaint form online or if it could be mailed to me and he refused, saying they weren't online, that the department didn't mail them and that I should just come in and give him a statement.

I told him again that it would be a hardship for me to come in, that I did not feel safe in Shelby Township since I knew that this irrational man was roaming around free and that I would like to have it mailed to me. He once again refused, and told me to come in again.

I won't be doing that. Instead, I have decided to write up my statement, include the pictures, send it in to the Chief of Police there, Robert L. Leman, and then copy the whole thing and forward it both to the State Police, the township's trustees and to Attorney General Mike Cox's office. Perhaps someone in one of those places will act on the matter. I don't know. If anyone reading this has any ideas of where it ought to be sent other than those I've listed, please email me and let me know.

Lt. Woelkers tells me he will send Officer Fox back out to CostCo and see if there are any tapes of the parking lot available. I do not believe him, to be frank. I don't think any further investigation will happen unless the department is somehow forced to do so and even then, I doubt the officer will do anything more than file a report that is completely favorable to this young lunatic that came after me.



Police reports are public information, I believe. I will be attempting to get a copy of the report to see what resemblance it bears to what actually happened and what the officer claims to have told me, etc. I doubt it will be forwarded to the prosecutor as promised and I am angry that the department is taking the stance that this is not a problem and that the second vehicle, the one with the personalized plates, is being viewed as having been "credible witnesses" when the black male driving very clearly benefited from this lunatic's actions.

The one thing I would like to add is that even though I will never willingly set foot in Shelby Township, Macomb County, Michigan again and I have zero respect for this officer and the others involed, including Lt. Woelkers, who was certainly deeply interested in covering his, and his officer's, butt, but really didn't give a damn about a citizen being attacked on his turf, I remain 100% supportive of the law enforcement community. Mostly good people trying to do a good job.

But someone needs to start worrying about the kinds and levels of violence that man's two young sons are being exposed to. It's a sad situation, in my opinion, very sad, and very dangerous.

Stop that; it's silly

Although I found the Basil Fawlty bit amusing on the face of it, the route it took to me was via what I felt was a sort of snide comment on my politics. Granted, I was feeling a bit touchy because some woman I work with had told me to "take my white ass back to Bush Country" the day before, but there was a little more history.

I ended up sending back the following meander to the little group that were on the original recipients list.

That is so cute....

With true "fawlty" logic, the folks in the towers have apparently missed a few things... without much regard to order but just as things come to mind, I'd like to respond a bit to those foolish folks over there looking down their noses at the majority of good folks who voted their conscience and belief systems 19 days ago...

1. 60,645,844 votes for Bush.
2. Entire population of the British Isles - 60,270,708 - and most of them do not have guns even for the purposes of putting meat on their tables nor are they willing to get off their Socialist arses (how's that for Queen's English?) to do so, let alone come prancing over here to take someone else's.
3. Accent. Despite some Brits’ inability to distinguish them as such, Australia and the like are not wholly owned subsidiaries of England. Australians do not speak with an English “accent” any more than citizens of the United States do. There are dialects, of course, but that's not quite the same thing. Folks will have to learn to say what they mean before they can rightfully expect anyone else to understand what they mean. Here’s the rundown, to save you from going to the dictionary. A fellow from France who is native speaking French has an accent when he is in the United States but Aussies and Brits only exhibit dialects of English, much the same way people in varying areas and social strata in England’s speech patterns exhibit dialectic differences.
4. While on the subject of "indian giving", the UK must strive to remember that they discarded those Aussies a fairly long time ago when they put their criminals and adjudged lowlifes on a boat and shipped them off telling them never to darken their door again. Too late to get them back now. Same goes for the descendants of those chased off for refusal to worship as ordered when ordered. Fair's fair, after all.
5. Re #8 - see numbers one and two above. More American Citizens voted to reelect the man they believe in and judged most capable to do the job than populates the entire conglomerate of the UK. With only 44 million voters in the UK, and a subset of only an estimated 60% of them willing to participate in the process, and far too many of the gentlemen that hope to gain a meager percentage of those votes punching each other in the noses, that whole name-calling business seems a bit over the top.
6. Re #4 - ok. The folks in Hollyweird don't represent the US populace any more than Benny Hill represented the UK. It's fine with me if any one of the many British actors who have deserted merry old England to make their homes in the United States is hired to play either criminal or good guy. In addition, I hope that the UK will broaden its point of view a bit and attempt to understand that the majority of the United States has become unutterably bored with politically correct and rather enjoys laughing at the foolishness of grown men who pretend to be capable of running a country or five punching each other in the nose. We're good with the humor as well, for the most part, and we're more than willing to send an extra dentist or two to take care of some of the nastier and more visible problems of those English actors that wish to gain employment in the movies produced and paid for by people in the United States.
7. No going back on the national anthem thing. We kicked the King and his various progeny out a long time ago and that means we get to pick the songs we sing when we play our silly games, just as the little fellows in shorts do right before they and all their audience members break out into a public
brawl. Oh, and if we ever decide we do want to run England, my vote is no more Beatles (or lame imitations thereof) from that day forth.
8. Number 11. Ok. Massachusetts has a far too high ninny quotient, as this is a state whose voting public will elect and reelect drunken sot murderers and other part-time politicians with voting tendencies so far out of step with reality that even they can't figure out if they support an issue or not. "I voted for it before I voted against it," indeed.
9. Number 14. There's been a misunderstanding. The 60-75 million gun owners in the US are not the group that hires 10,000 lawyers to stand by on the off chance there will be anything for them to do one day in November. Gun owners just get out and vote. The Party that the vast majority of them belong to is also not the Party that has members that refer to Condaleezza Rice as the President's "House Nigga" (see Michelle Malkin and Left Leaning Ted Rall for an explanation of my outrage on that issue) and it is also the Party whose elected head actually does have the politically correct "people of color" in positions of responsibility. They are also not the group that turns to therapy or attorneys for every issue. Please note that "PEST" is not a disorder that afflicts any of my Republican brothers and sisters but I, for one, was inordinately pleased to see this "disorder" labeled with such an appropriate acronym. While you're at it, Google up "10,000 lawyers" and see if the Party of my affiliation was the one putting down retainers.
10. Number 9. Nuclear vs nook-u-lar. We understand your frustration. Some of us want him to quit that as well, but, coming from a country that calls a bathroom a loo, a truck a lorry, an elevator a lift, an umbrelly a brolly, and has somehow turned a sneezy noise like "chuffed" into an alternative word for pleased, you'll forgive us for thinking it's really beyond the pale for you to point out such minor failures in communication. At least our country has a leader who can do more than ride through the streets of the most populace city twisting his/her hand back and forth in frozen, and decidedly aging, beauty queen fashion. The Queen is a charming idea, but all those pounds sterling wrapped up in supporting one family that keeps interbreeding with other plug uglies when the rest of the nation suffers from a pretty devastating lack of income, employment and dentistry issues, is a pretty silly focus point, in my not all that humble opinion.
11. Number 7. Well. No. You see, the people who wrote our Constitution had the forethought to include a Bill of Rights, quite deliberately crafted to enumerate rights that were presumed to be inherent and that should not be abridged, abrogated or ignored. This applies to firearms, of course, in the same exact way it applies to word processors and the equally important right not to be required to tattle on one's self. There is the assumption of innocence here in the US and that means that until one is convicted of a crime, one must not be assumed to be ready to commit a crime, despite the possession of tools that might one day be used in a criminal activity. Oh, and we will not be allowing countries not a party to our Constitution to outlaw guns, cards, dice, automobiles, kitchen knives, computers, cameras or baseball bats because they might one day be used in a criminal manner, either. And of course, the outlawing of anything we do, either as individuals or a country by a non-existent "government" in the form of the (dis)United Nations is simply not going to happen, like it or not. With the grace of God and support of the finest all volunteer fighting forces in the world, our government, by virtue of its Constitution, has promised us that UN troops will never occupy our nation and roast kiddies for lunch.
12. Combining a concept here. First part. Being on our knees to a Queen went out with the Clinton Era. We also saved your pimpled behinds in two World Wars so, while we appreciate your government’s support in recent world security issues, we hope you understand by now “taking back” anything from us isn’t really an option worth considering. Again, think 60,645,844 and keep in mind that even a few of the rest of the folks here might rise up in irritation should you fellows show up on our shores expecting to see a white flag.
13. Number 11. As an aside, there are many members of the "reigning" Party in the US that are offended by the caricatures being drawn of us. We are tired of being accused of only putting "people of color" in prominent positions as "tokens" by a Party whose membership doesn't put them in any prominent position for ANY reason. We are also offended by the idea that people find us uncharitable and unwilling to help our fellow citizens in times of need when, in reality, many of us simply understand that there is little more racist or sexist than not believing that a group, by virtue of its ethnicity or lack of possession of a Y chromosome has been, again, solely by virtue of possession of those characteristics, rendered incapable of building a productive life without supervision and facilitation by those whose egos are so swollen that they feel that the aforementioned groups cannot adequately function without their organized intervention. See the Generosity Data and, in more condensed form, the graphic at Michelle Malkin's blog for clarification. Those of us who are looked down on for our "down home" attitude and moral stance would like to remind those folks who identify with ideas such as the public dole and various other entitlement programs that for true charity to have meaning it must come out of their pockets voluntarily, not mine by what amounts to Legislative force. I have worked my behind off over the years to attain a position in life via hard work and diligent effort that pays more than they think I should have based on my membership in a political Party.
BTW, my husband and I file our income taxes together and pay what we are required to pay. It is a curiosity to me (and others) why, as an example, Mr. Kerry and his wife dodge tax bills the way they do by filing separately. I do understand the wish to save money but when you've got $500 million or so in your pocket and your husband is constantly harping on how bad tax cuts are for the nation, it seems a tad hypocritical at best.
14. In a nation that has outlawed the basic right to self defense and will jail elderly farmers who end up killing career criminals who invade his home and then compound that offense by (1) providing the dead criminal's equally criminal partner with the funding to sue said farmer and (2) deny the same farmer parole because he might pose a threat to other career criminal burglars, there aren't a whole lot of people that really have much to say to me about firearms that I'm interested in hearing. Despite the arrogance of some across the sea who have lost the concept of basic human rights, those of us on this side of the pond capable of logical thinking will not soon be abandoning our right to life, liberty and the pursuit of happiness.

Oh, and while the people bought and paid for by one foreign born gentleman are busy claiming fraud, etc., I will go by my own experience - Election Fraud in Wayne County, MI - in looking at the Party that apparently believes that violence and intimidation is a valid voter influence tool.

Comedy is entertaining and I have always enjoyed the British sense of rather dry humor. However, I draw a very sharp line at being told how I should behave by elitist snobs who somehow imagine that because they have attained a position for no other reason than the ability to read a line as written or the accidental possession of a pleasing visual arrangement of the features God (or random theories, as the case may be) has bestowed upon them, that they are now entitled to some importance being attached to their opinions.

Happy Sunday, kids, it's been a great weekend for me. I just helped 17 people qualify for concealed carry permits, including two women, one of whom is disabled and used to live in fear of not being able to outrun an attacker due to cystic fibrosis. I say good on her for not giving up or giving in.